| |
|
|
| |
 |
- Email Message Suggests A Strategy That
Makes Sense When Fighting High Gas
Prices
- Valley East Resident Refers to ATV's
As Environmental Menace
- Reg Couldridge Speaks Highly About Valley
Community Theatre
- Monique Grenon Asks, " How Do We
Change?"
- University of Regina To Study Impact of
Stress on Hockey Officials
- Hockey Parent & Referee Vows To
"Speak Out" To Curb Abusive
Behaviour of Coaches and Fans
- So
You Want to Coach Minor Hockey
- Generate More Interest In Officiating
Is A Major Concern For Writer
- Hockey Referee From UK Asks Questions
We Hear All The Time In North America
- Reader Is Impressed With Treatment
At Howard Armstrong Recreation Centre
- Simple Exercise Demonstrates What
Is Really Important When It Comes To Communication
|
|
| |
| Email Message
Suggests A Strategy That Makes Sense When Fighting High Gas Prices |
|
| There have been many suggestions on how to fight the high
gas prices that are frustrating drivers in recent years. Some have
suggested boycotting all gasoline stations for a day. However, an email
message received by Valley East Today seems to have come up with a pretty
good strategic plan that just might work.
ULTIMATE GOAL IS TO DRIVE DOWN PRICES TO A FAIR LEVEL
The oil companies are stating that the prices at the pump reflect the
market prices. We all know that market prices are set at what the market
will bear. In other words, all oil companies are competing with each
other, so they all want their prices to be competitive in order to retain
their share of the market.
The email strategy, which was apparently put forward by a retired Coca
Cola executive suggests that drivers boycott ONE COMPANY ONLY.
In other words, select a company like Petro Canada which has 1500
retail locations across the country sells 68 million gallons of gasoline
each day. If there was a movement across the entire country to begin
boycotting Petro Canada ONLY, then before long Petro Canada would be
forced to lower its prices in order to draw back its share of the market.
It wouldn't take long for this to happen if all of a sudden 68 million
gallons of gasoline per day started to back up on the company. Where would
they store the product?
Once Petro Canada lowered the price, others would follow suit. If the
drop in price was not significant, then the boycott would continue until
it reached what experts feel would be a fair price - somewhere in the 90
cent per litre range.
Proponents of the strategy are suggesting that drivers begin this
campaign on June 1. |
| |
| Valley East Resident Refers to
ATV's As Environmental Menace |
|
| The following letter was submitted to Valley East
Today by Glenn Murray, a long-time resident of Valley East and a
well-known supporter of this community.
With few exceptions the ATV has become the greatest menace to the bush
and trails in and around the City of Greater Sudbury. Their large lugged
tires tear up trails creating deep ruts where water collects and create
mud holes. Once they can no longer go through these ruts, they start new
ones. Creek and river banks are eroded by the passage of the ATV and the
water ways through which they travel become polluted. The ATV's ability to
travel further into the bush has resulted in new areas in which dumping
can occur. No property, public or private, signed or unsigned, fenced or
not fenced, is safe from some of the fools that ride these things. Many of
the trails, paths and off road byways used for years by walkers, hikers,
runners, cyclists, and even horses, have been rendered unsafe and
unpleasant by the ATV. Land that does not become a mud hole becomes a
desert as the top soil is torn off allowing large plumes of dust to engulf
those who are trying to enjoy more environmentally friendly activities.
For the half dozen or so sensible, safe, and legal operators of these
machines, I feel sorry for you. Technology has outstripped society's and
the environment's ability to handle you and through the selfish,
inconsiderate actions of others that obey no laws regardless if they are
on the street or on a trail, it is time the ATVs are banned. If you want
to ride your ATV then it must be taken to a place that is set up for your
use alone, where the dust and noise you create bothers no one. If you say
there are no such places, then you have to build them.


|
| |
| Reg Couldridge Speaks Highly About
Valley Community Theatre |
|
| |
Of the many groups of volunteers that contribute their
time, efforts and talents in providing services to our local community, the
Valley Community Theatre is one group that receives very little exposure in
the established news media that covers Sudbury.
This group of talented and dedicated local citizens have put on many
productions that have amused and entertained the public for many years. The
last Christmas production "A Christmas Survival Story" was a great success,
in spite of the terrible weather on the days of the production. Previous
productions were also an equally great success.
The Valley Community Theatre group produces, directs and performs in these
productions by their volunteer services. The group's only goals are to
provide a vehicle whereby local talent have an opportunity to gain
experience and exposure in the theatre arts, as well as to bring culture and
entertainment to our local community.
The popular musical comedy "Nunsense" is the groups Spring 2007
production.

This production will be presented at Ecole Secondaire Hanmer/Hanmer
Secondary School, 480 Notre Dame, Hanmer on 26,27 & 28 April and again on 3
& 5 May with the Gala performance on 5 May 2007. Each
performance will commence at 7:0 pm each evening. Tickets are $10 and $12
for the Gala performance and available from Popcorn Video and Valley Plaza
Pharmasave in the Hanmer Mall, and Rexall Pharmacy, ValCaron & Caise
Populaire in Hanmer, or at the door if vacancies are available on the night.
Like every production presented by Valley Community Theatre "Nunsense"
promises to be a great night of entertainment at a bargain price. All
residents should support Valley Community Theatre and similar groups. They
give our citizens the opportunity to demonstrate their talents as well as an
entry into the theatre arts and entertainment fields that otherwise
might be blocked to them.
Reg Couldridge
|
| |
|
Monique Grenon Asks, " How
Do We Change?" |
|
Hi
Mr. Kirwan:
I was reading one of the story you have about a referee in hockey(see
the article below), and having to deal with verbal abuse from parents
and coach's and sometimes kids.
You know I think the swearing issue is getting worse, as years go
on. Parents go to hockey games and many yell and swear at coach's,
referee's and sometimes spectators. Hockey is supposed to be a sport
to have fun and meet new people. I guess a lot of these problems originate
from watching professional hockey players behave and play.
I hear young girls and guys around 11 to 17 years of age, that hang
around our confectionary store. They stand outside and talk to their
friends and the language that comes out of their mouth is frightful. I
guess they think its cool, because some of them probably hear at
home. Or they feel powerful if they swear a lot, and do it loud so
everyone can hear them.
Don't get me wrong not all kids talk this way, but the ones that
do - it is very disturbing. And this new young generation we have now:
some have no respect for anyone. If you look at them the wrong way, they
swear at you with every second word. It does not bother me, if they have
different hair do's or wear different clothes or earrings and tattoos
everywhere, that's their own personal choice. We all had our own
style even when we were young. But the swearing and disrespecting people
has to change.
How do parents help their kids change this awful behavior. And some
parents don't believe that their child is capable in behaving in such a
rational behavior. Don't get me wrong my kid was no angel in her younger
days, but I always tried to guide her in the right direction. And she was
also disciplined when she spoke in this type of language or disrespected
someone.
These days you need two parents working to survive and this is very
hard when raising children.
The big question is HOW DO WE HELP CHANGE THESE AWFUL BEHAVIORS? |
| University of Regina To Study
Stress On Hockey Officials "The Stress of The Game" |
|
In a recent press release from
the University of Regina, it appears as if researchers are about to study
how the game of hockey affects hockey officials with respect to stress.
This may partly answer Monique's question above.
Up to 10,000 hockey officials from across Canada will be part of a
three-year study into the stressors they face, how they cope, the
satisfaction they get while playing an often unpopular role on the ice,
and how those factors affect their ability to achieve their peak
performance.
The study will be done by Kim Dorsch and Harold Riemer of the University
of Regina’s Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, along with David
Paskevich of the University of Calgary and Robert Schinke from Laurentian
University. It is a joint initiative with Sport Canada, funded by a
$130,000 grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.
“Sport Canada has been looking at sports at the grassroots level for
ways to encourage more people to become active,” Dorsch explains. “In
the observed data, Hockey Canada has found that approximately one-third of
registered officials discontinue their involvement in any given year. If
the officials are having difficulty coping with abusive fans, players or
coaches, our objective is to help them deal with it effectively, so they
can continue to participate.”
During the first year of the study Dorsch and her colleagues plan to
survey as many as 10,000 officials from across Canada, from Level One up
to the elite Level Six. Working closely with Hockey Canada, Canadian
Interuniversity Sport (CIS) and the Saskatchewan Hockey Association, the
researchers will ask officials what they perceive as stressors, assess
their hardiness and coping styles, and ask them to state how satisfied
they are with their performance, using various measures.
“Once we have an understanding of the personal characteristics of
officials, we can begin to develop workshops and other tools to help
officials cope while they are on the ice and manage their stressors so
they can do their job effectively,” Dorsch says. “It's an area of the
game that's wide open for research, which is surprising, because you can't
play the game without officials.”
Doug Lawrence, Saskatchewan Hockey Association (SHA) south supervision co-ordinator
of the referees’ division, is the liaison between SHA and the research
team. Lawrence says hockey officials and players across Canada will
benefit from the study.
“Hockey officials are an important part of the game and need the support
that will come from the information this research will provide. We look
forward to participating in the study for the betterment of everyone
involved in hockey, from officials to players, coaches and fans.” |
|
 |
 |
| The special web site found at www.afterthewhistle.com
is another site that I publish. It too contains a great deal of
insight into the game of hockey and is directed at minor hockey
players, coaches and fans. The site gives perspective into the game
from an official's point of view and is designed to help people
better understand the finer points of the game.
All we can do is provide the best modeling possible for our young
children. If they see proper behaviour often enough, they will
incorporate this behaviour into their own character. |
|
| |
| Hockey Parent
& Referee Vows To "Speak Out" To Curb Abusive
Behaviour of Coaches and Fans |
|
| I am just coming off a full
weekend of Pee Wee hockey.
I took some time off work to do some games
on Friday. I took some time away from my kids on Saturday and even again
on Sunday.
Now why would I do that? The money, for the
fame and notoriety? Or to take the abuse that people have come to
think as acceptable behaviour.
This weekend the calibre of games varied
from house league to peewee A. and for those coaches out there that do it
right I congratulate you. At the beginning of the tournament one of
the coaches pulled me aside and asked me the style of officiating in our
area. Was it by the book? or do we let them play. I asked him
what difference it was going to be to him, would it change his style of
coaching? No he stated, the Ref's style just influences the number
of pills he had to take. He was kidding. He was just looking
for an edge in the game. He wanted to know if he could push his kids
a little more or if he had to spend his time teaching them to stay out of
the box. For the most part the officials in this area are a good
combination of the enforcement of the rules and letting them play.
And letting them play has become much easier in the last month or so as
the players have caught on to skating faster rather than hooking with the
stick.
What has got me upset enough to write about is
the relationship between coaches and officials, was a game on the weekend.
Let me set up the scenario, Sunday morning 8 am -32 out side a balmy -25
inside. Home town crowd packing it in (maybe 10 parents) and the
local team vs. an out of town team. On the ice for a Pee Wee house
league game - three senior officials with 60 plus years of experience.
over kill maybe but gave the coaches no way to complain right! I
live in a dream world I know. The puck drops and the mouths open.
This coach questioned everything the linesmen where doing. When he
got no response, he resorted to name calling and eventually swearing.
It took all of 30 seconds for him to go from polite to over the top.
As the Ref I went over to his bench and called him down from his throne
that allows the coach to look down on his humble servants. I tried
to explain that this kind of language would not be tolerated and
that he needs to calm down. I did not want to have to give him a bench
minor. He starts talking to me like I am a child and says "show
me where I can't use profane language in the rule book or in the
tournament rules". Is he kidding. Does he think I am an
idiot. I dinged him for two. just for being an idiot. I
had no hope that my actions would calm him down. He just irritated
me with his stupidity. But for the moment he stopped. The
assistant coach did however, start talking to me and started off by saying
first" I know we are playing the host team and they are going to get
the game called in their favour but do you mind explaining to me why you
gave us a bench for swearing. When I read the tournament rules it
did not state that we could not do this." I can't say what I
was thinking.
Ever just want to call a spade a Spade.
In almost every game I do take abuse. From the fans from the coaches
and to some degree the kids but only because the Adults have paved there
way. On Monday night I did a game between some bantam boys house league
and their moms, one of the many women's teams in our area. The coach of
the boys team is a known yapper, but he cries and hides. He doesn't
think we know it is him until he gets a bench penalty. Anyway during
this fun game I realized he does have some ability as a coach. he was not
worried about what I was doing on the ice he concentrated on his kids.
After the game I asked him what he thought and he said that was the most
fun he had, at a hockey game in a long time. He forgot about what I was
doing and concentrated on his team, and that was the most fun he had,
makes you think doesn't it.
In the same age group but in "A"
or Rep calibre we have this coach who I know does not like my style of
officiating. But only two people know of his discontent. He and I.
He has chosen to coach his team on the ice and not worry about what I do.
He doesn't blame me for penalties and he tells his players, if you hadn't
pushed him after the whistle you would still be on the ice. But in
an appropriate setting he has no problem re-living every call I made and
questioning my motives. Like I said only two of us know about how
much he dislikes me on the ice.
Now tell me people. Do you really believe
the reason we have officials on the ice is so you have an out let to vent
your anger? You can't believe that swearing is okay in minor hockey.
It is not tolerated in most work environments why would it be acceptable
in a kids sport. WE Must change are way of thinking before more
people are hurt in a hockey game. A ref falls, the crowd cheers.
A puck gets caught in a Ref's skate the crowd yells. The ref blows
the whistle on a close off side the crowd screams, if he waves the same
play off the crowd screams for an off side. No matter what our call
is we cause rational people to scream and carry on like animals. So
why do it. Why put my self in this situation. Why allow my 4
year old to play a game that breeds violence and abuse. After a
tournament weekend you have to wonder is the exercise worth it, time away
from my family worth it. I have a very hard time justifying it.
So why allow my 4 year old to play. I
look back at my hockey career and I can remember so many great things, the
coaches, the players and even some of the parents. The people I met
through playing, I am friends with some of them today. So why let my
son play. Well he is a 4 year old sports addict. I introduced
him to skating as soon as he could walk, I bought him a hockey stick so we
could pass a puck. Now because he asks me to play, we play hockey inside
or outside every day. For his birthday he wanted a hockey net and goalie
stick. For Christmas he wanted a goalie mask and pads. He can
not wait for the weekend so we can go to hockey. He loves it.
He wants to be a Referee when he is bigger. (he still thinks I am
cool). As a four year old he is making friends with kids from
different communities, from different schools and with different
languages. SO why let him play knowing what I know about parents and
coaches once kids grow out of Tim Bits. Because I will speak up and
let others know, let the parents & coaches know that it is not
acceptable to scream and abuse the young and old officials on the ice.
Speak Out.
David-Sean Rowell
Hockey Parent &
Referee |
| |
|
So
You Want to Coach Minor Hockey
A letter sent to After The Whistle by a concerned hockey
parent and coach... |
|
|
It has been two years since I left the coaching ranks
of minor hockey. Watching the Hockey Day in
Canada
event on television recently and seeing some of the great features
presented throughout the day on the game’s volunteers had me reflecting
on my own experiences as a minor hockey coach, and to ask the question
“Why does an individual volunteer to coach minor hockey (sports)?”
So why does one want to coach minor hockey? There are a many valuable
reasons why one wants to be a minor hockey coach:
·
Working with children and young adults
·
To teach what you have learned from playing and being
associated the game
·
To stay involve and give back to the game, what it gave to
you
·
For the sheer love of this great sport
These are just a few and each of us I’m sure has many other reasons why
we want to coach minor hockey. I first decided to coach when my son was
old enough to register for hockey 10 years ago. I had been associated with
the sport for virtually my entire life in one capacity or another. I felt
I had a solid background to teach the game being a former Junior, College
and Senior player, and as an administrator of many minor sports program
with my background as a Recreation Practitioner where I had seen many
coaches handle, and perhaps not handle, the pitfalls that can come with
coaching minor sports.
Yes I heard horror stories from individuals who
coached about the problems that can occur from the parents of the kids you
coach. Perhaps naïve I felt with my background and that fact I was seen
as diplomatic in my professional life would be more than enough tools to
combat the worse scenarios that might occur. So yes I was “ready” to
tackle the ranks of a minor hockey coach
Those first three years as
a “Pre- Novice” (5, 6 & 7 yr olds) coach were great. Just like I
thought they would be or even better. I seemed to have the right demeanor
and the program I had established was solid. Everyone loved “Coach”
and I could do no wrong. Next level is Sr. Novice (8& 9). Teams are
now divided into an “A” and “B” traveling team and 4 house league
teams.
Coaches go through an interview process and players
are evaluated and placed on teams based on their skill. A small perception
is beginning to be established among some parents who hint that players
are selected for teams because of who their parents know. I coach the
“B” team and, unlike the “A” team, there are some expectations but
nothing grand. Parents hope their kids learn and develop and perhaps win a
few games in the process. Well the team surpasses expectations to have a
great year and ultimately win the league championship. “Coach” is a
miracle worker, an asset to the organization, the next Scotty Bowman, and
can do no wrong. That year I receive our association’s Coach of the Year
award. Now in the back of my mind I think it was Don Cherry that said
receiving the Coach of the Year was the kiss of death. Anyway let’s
continue.
The following year my son evaluates to the Novice
“A” team and subsequently I am interviewed for the head coach of that
team. I am successful but not without some negative backlash as to why I
was selected over another individual.
Parent’s expectations are higher than the previous
year because we are now the “A” team and the “A” means better.
League play is tough and we are challenged talent wise compared to other
centers. The team steadily improves but do not make the playoffs. However
the club has a successful year-end tournament run winning two A side
championships and coming in second in the final tournament. The season is
salvaged somewhat but my “jolly good fellow” tag has diminished.
The
next year sees the age categories change and therefore my son is now in
his first and final year of Atom. He again evaluates and is placed on the
Atom “A” team and again I interview for head coach of that team
against the same person from a year ago, ending in the same results.
Expectations from parents increase further as the next year will be Pee
Wee and “AA” hockey and I better get these kids ready.
The team that I have is fairly similar to the
previous year with two or three changes, and play against virtually the
same group of kids from a year ago, and again are challenged talent wise.
Once again we come short of making the playoffs but have some success in
tournament play and qualify for the provincial Atom “A” Provincial
tournament.
Knowing we are headed for the provincial finals I
begin to make some adjustments, moving players from defense to forward and
vice versa and experiment with special teams, as we know the competition
will be tough. Some parents are angry and tell me I am setting up their
kids for failure. Nonetheless we have a solid provincial championship and
lose in the semi finals. A decent finish to a tough season! “Coach”
still has his supporters but some parents are not happy with losing and
question our talent level, and my coaching abilities. The “jolly good
fellow” tag is gone.
The next season is Pee Wee, and the beginning of
“AA” hockey. Coach selections are done in the summer, as coaches are
now responsible to pick the entire team. I am again in competition with
the same guy over the last two years and again awarded the head coach
job.
Try outs commence and “oddly” enough I regain my
title as “ jolly good fellow” for awhile and everybody wants to talk
to me…hmmm. The offers to buy me coffees and hot dogs have never been
greater, that is until my final player selections are made. From that
point on I am “public enemy number one”.
I receive scathing and attacking letters and phone
calls. I have “ruined the lives and careers of several 11 and 12 year
old boys”, so I am told. As the year moves on it is very apparent our
talent level does not stack up against the large centers and our team
struggles. Parents become disillusioned with high-end hockey and some feel
we should not be playing at this level at all. Others blame me entirely
with one parent pulling his boy because I did not pick the right players
for his son to be successful with. I have discipline problems with some
kids and the year is very tough.
I do not only lose the title of “jolly good
fellow” for good, I lose friends (or so I thought they were friends) and
acquaintances because I did not select their child, and because of our
record. As well my wife and son are looked down upon from some of these
people.
I consider packing it in after the year but really
still love coaching and do not want it to end like this. So I re-apply for
the same position the next year and this time I am unattested. The try out
numbers are very low and the quality of kids to choose from is very
thin.
Knowing this will likely be my last year I bring on
some young non-parent assistant coaches to mentor with the hopes they will
continue on and add a fresh perspective. We are more competitive than the
previous year and there is potential to win more games, but for that to
occur the bench, at times, may have to be shortened, right or wrong.
The games are won but the outcry begins. The dreaded
parent meeting with the coach and association occurs and the end result is
winning is now not important and equal ice time is. I can live with that
if they (parents) can.
Well we go on a miserable losing streak that
virtually knocks us out of the playoffs by Christmas. Some parents are
again angry about the losing. We have another player that quits because
the level of players on the team is not “good enough”, along with the
coaching, for their son to achieve success. The year is almost worse than
the previous and it is certain that I have coached my last season… for a
while anyway.
I suppose reading about my experience one might think this is sour grapes
on my part and I deserved the outcome. I guess I still harbor some ill
feelings and have some regrets of friendships lost or at the very least
substantially tarnished, and from other individuals that I had never
known, period, that will forever despise me because I was either selected
as a coach over them or had to cut their kid in the process of selecting
my team.
It is these outcomes that I feel no volunteer, coach
or otherwise, deserves to ever have happen to them. However I have also
come to understand if you are going to put your neck out you have to
expect people will try to chop it off. As a volunteer coach you must
understand parents will question things you do and probably have some
right in doing that in today’s world. Non-parent coaches can shrug this
aside because they usually have no past history with the parents or
players. However a parent coach likely knows a number of these people
through school functions etc. and it then becomes harder, or more
uncomfortable, to deal with.
It is not my intent to scare individuals away from
coaching, but to have them understand the evolution that usually occurs.
More times than not my story is similar to many others. So what can you do
to avoid some of these potential pitfalls? Probably nothing. They are part
of what one has to endure as a volunteer coach.
However to minimize what will no doubt eventually
take place, consider the following if you want to coach minor hockey (or
minor sports in general).
- If
you are going to be head coach of your own child’s team consider not
going past Atom (9 and 10 yr old) or at least into Pee Wee “AA” or
higher. Your integrity as a parent coach will be scrutinized over and
over at this level or higher. Usually at the lower levels, the
association’s evaluators primarily do the selection process for you.
So basically you do not have to make the “tough decisions”
regarding player selections and this is probably the most contentious
issue as a parent coach…or coach period.
- Coach
a team your child is not on, or offer to no more than assist the team
he or she is on. If you truly love coaching and want to be the head
coach you will have a better chance of survival by doing this. If you
feel you can’t do this because of conflicts in your child’s
schedule versus the team you may be coaching, then step away for a few
years or take a different role on your child’s team (manager,
trainer etc). If you love coaching there will always be a team to
coach once your children have passed through the system
- Understand
that you are going to have conflicts, especially at the high-end
levels. By simply ignoring this and thinking “not me” will only
certainly come back to bite you in the back end. Talk to past coaches
and really investigate how to manage through the parent pitfalls.
- Check
with your association to see what measures they have in place to
combat parent “abuse” and other support features they offer
coaches. Plain and simple if your association has no plan for this you
as a coach are in a no win situation
One final note is to not take yourself or your position too seriously. Yes
it is a huge responsibility to coach children and the parents do deserve a
committed and trained individual who is always prepared at practice and
games. However we all have to remember it is still a game or recreation
pursuit. The cream eventually rises to the top regardless of coaching or
success of a particular team. You can assist that process as a coach but
understand it is the player…and fortunately or unfortunately his/her
parent, who will eventually determine their own destiny in hockey.
Oh yes will I coach again? I would like to but likely
in an assistant position as I think my experience, and what I have
experienced would be more beneficial for supporting a head coach…. and I
would still get to work with the kids!
Jim Racette
Okotoks
,
AB
|
| |
| Generate More Interest In Officiating
Is A Major Concern For Writer |
|
Dear Editor:
I'm not sure if you have
the same issue that we have here in Alberta but we cannot seem to get the
numbers up for officials.
One of the constraints is that the
certification is a 2-day seminar. Unfortunately, today's fast paced
business world does not allow that kind of time commitment.
Comments I have heard include: " I could take a couple of hours to
ref a game but 2 days is too much."
I may have a solution.
In Alberta we have a Petroleum Safety Training program that could be a
model for training officials. I propose that an internet course be
offered that the participant could complete in their own time and when
completed a certificate could be printed. The participant could
then enroll in an on-ice session to complete the officiating training for
2-3 hours.
This would free up instructors as well so that more
sessions could be offered. Just a technological advance that may
serve us in gaining some numbers.
Brett Marple, Fox Creek, Alberta |
| Thank you for your letter, Brett:
We certainly do have the same problem in Sudbury and it appears
as if it may be even more difficult to find people who are
interested in becoming certified as hockey officials. The system
will have to provide more support for officials who are already in
the game and will also have to come up with a way of establishing a
"coaching program" to ensure that hockey referees are
nurtured and developed, thus ensuring that they remain in the
sport. Robert Kirwan, Publisher |
|
| |
| Hockey Referee From UK Asks Questions
We Hear All The Time In North America |
|
| The following is a letter that was sent to
one of our other Online Publications, After The Whistle Hockey Magazine from
a hockey referee in the UK. It shows that the problems we face in North
America are also being felt around the world. Hi
After the Whistle,
I’m
an IIHF level 3 referee in the
UK
and thought I would share one of my worst game experiences with you.
Well it
all started when I was refereeing a U14’s South Group A game in
Cardiff
,
Wales. It was a close game until mid 2nd
period when the home side started taking silly penalties. Things started
to get a little heated as the home side lost their 1 goal disadvantage and increased it to a 3 goal
one. Play was in their defending zone and an attacking player had the
puck. As he went to pass it, a defending player trying to gain control
twisted and fell.
Now to me it was easy to see the player in question
wasn’t getting up in a hurry but wasn’t badly injured, so I let play
continue as the home team had possession. The player in question had to be
helped from the ice by his coach. There was no problem at this time
because the player was not from the home side and the home team was able
to continue with the play.
Later
on in the game the home side was on a 5 on 3 play and sure enough were
dominating play with the 2 man advantage.
As they were breaking out of the their defending zone
an away player skated hard and tripped hitting his head hard on the
boards. Now there was no plenty to call as I’m sure there is no tripping
plenty for tripping yourself. The player hit the boards with such force
you heard it all over the rink. It was obvious to everyone that this
player had done himself a serious injury. Even though the home team had
possession of the puck and the injured player was from the visiting side,
I stopped the play immediately because I suspected a serious injury.
The home
coach went mental and started shouting all sorts of things across the ice.
He then picked up an ice pack and threw it across the
ice to which I had to duck to avoid.
Now I know we all get a little annoyed at times but
to lose it that much who knows why, especially when he had gained an
advantage earlier from his player falling badly.
I had no choice but to assess him a Match penalty for
Abuse of Officials. The problem was he went even more mental and on his
way off the bench threw a chair on the ice as well. In the end he had to
be ejected from the building by rink staff - not much of an example to
kids really.
In
his defence to the league he said “play should never be stopped for an
injury”;
Now don’t know which rule book he’s read but the IIHF
2006-2010 one says different.
416
- INJURED PLAYERS
a)
If a player is injured and cannot continue to play or go to the bench, the
play shall
continue
until his team has secured possession of the puck, unless any team is
in an immediate scoring position.
b)
If a player other than the goalkeeper is injured or compelled to leave the
ice during
the
game, he may retire and be replaced by a substitute, but play shall
continue
without
the teams leaving the ice.
c)
If a penalized player has been injured he may proceed to the dressing
room, and
if
he has been assessed a Minor, Major or Match penalty, the penalized team
shall
immediately
put a substitute player on the penalty bench who shall serve the
penalty
without change, except by the injured penalized player if he is able to
return.
d)
The injured penalized player shall not be eligible to play until his
penalty has expired.
e)
If an injured player returns to play before his penalty has expired, the
Referee shall
assess
additionally to this player a:
➤
Minor
penalty
(2’)
➤
1.
If
it is obvious that a player has sustained a serious injury, the Referee
and/or the
Linesman shall stop the play immediately.
➤2.
When
play has been stopped due to an injured player, excluding the goalkeeper,
the
injured player shall leave the ice and shall not return to the ice until
after
play has resumed.
So
not only was I correct in my 1st call to let play continue
until they gained possession. But I was correct in my 2nd call
in that not only had the player sustained a serious Injury, they were in a
scoring position.
If
anything is going to come out of this it’s maybe that before players,
coaches and fans go mental at us referee’s maybe they should spend a
little time and study the rules. Yes we make mistakes but we are only
human but I’m the 1st person to admit when I’m wrong so
maybe they should to.
Happy
hockey and lets all work together to a cleaner more fun game for players,
fans and us officials
Adrian
Neilly
Cardiff
UK
|
| |
| Reader Is Impressed With Treatment
At Howard Armstrong Recreation Centre |
| A tip of the hat on a job well done!
I want to take a moment to congratulate the Howard Armstrong
Recreation Centre in Hanmer on their spectacular facilities and
wonderful staff.
After belonging to two other similar centres in Sudbury where the
staff always had the attitude of "don't interrupt my computer
games lady", it's a refreshing change to have such pleasant
young people give their absolute undivided attention to their
members.
I haven't come across such enthusiasn!
If others are interested in learning to swim I can personally
recommend Sharon, Brandon, Ashley and Jessie - the instructors
there.
There's adult, public, family and lane swimming lessons, as well
as aquasize and swimming lessons.. Track, machines, sauna and hot
tub too, of course - all for a great price. This is certainly
asssisting me with my New Year's Resolution.
Sincerly
Heather Brown |
|
| |
| Simple Exercise Demonstrates What
Is Really Important When It Comes To Communication |
|
| For as long as I can remember the debate about the
importance of spelling in the school curriculum has gone on. Teachers have
been on both sides of the issue. Some feel it is more important to
encourage the communication of ideas and others state that it is important
that grammar and spelling be emphasized. Actually, we need a good balance
of both and we all know how quickly a spelling mistake jumps off the page
when you are reading an article.
However, if you take the following test, you may be surprised at the
results.
Try to read the following sentences. Once you get by the first
sentence, look at how easy it is to read the rest. |
|
I
cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The
phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in
a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat
ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you
can
sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm.
Tihs
is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but
the wrod as a wlohe.
Amzanig
huh?
Yaeh
and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! |
|
| I want to thank Monique Grenon for sending this
to me by email.
As a career educator, I would never accept anything like this from one
of my students, but I also took care to pay more attention to "what a
child was saying in his/her writing" than the technical part of the
product. I believe that you can teach a person how to spell, but it takes
a special skill to be able to express what you are feeling. That is
communication and this exercise proves just what is most important. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|